Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Blakley et al v. Torres et al
as 3:2011cv00313
Plaintiff:
Jesse Thomas Blakley and Ceaser Cisneros
Defendant:
Jessica Torres, Coleir Loham, David Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakley v. Ross
as 2:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jesse Thomas Blakley
Defendant:
Anthony Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakley v. Ross
as 3:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jesse Thomas Blakley
Defendant:
Anthony Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Titus Thomas v. Sgt. Middleton
as 11-6120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT MIDDLETON, B. L. MAUST, Officer, IMANI GREEN, Inmate, ID 337-646 and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Titus Thomas v. Sgt. Middleton
as 11-6041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT MIDDLETON, B. L. MAUST, Officer, IMANI GREEN, Inmate, ID 337-646 and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Titus Thomas v. Sergeant Huff
as 10-7764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT HUFF, SERGEANT R. LIKIN, SERGEANT JOHN IHEOMA and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson, III v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv07639
Plaintiff:
Curlee Johnson, III
Defendant:
Jesse Thomas and Philip Morganstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Titus Thomas v. Sergeant Middleton
as 10-7643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER GERAGHTY, IMANI GREEN, Inmate #337-646, JESSE THOMAS, Inmate #340-968 and others
Respondent - Appellee:
SERGEANT MIDDLETON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv02195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Sgt. Huff et al
as 8:2010cv02153
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
Sgt. Huff, Sgt. R Likin, Sgt. John Iheoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
