Cases 31 - 40 of 218
WEISENBERGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08256
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALLEN WEISENBERGER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph Colwell, Sr. v. Chance Leeds, et al
as 22-5343
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH ALLEN COLWELL, SR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
Respondent / Appellee:
CHANCE LEEDS, Warden
Brown v. Dowling
as 22-5021
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH ALLEN BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
JANET DOWLING
United States v. Maldonado-Passage
as 22-6025
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MALDONADO-PASSAGE, AKA Joseph Allen Maldonado, AKA Joseph Allen Schreibvogel, AKA Joe Exotic
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02423
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ALLEN HARMON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Nelson et al
as 2:2021cv01097
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen
Defendant:
Jeff Nelson, City of Auburn and auburn police department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54097
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH ALLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Auburn City Police Department and Joseph Allen
Defendant:
Jeff Nelson and Auburn City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Maldonado-Passage
as 20-6010
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MALDONADO-PASSAGE, AKA Joseph Allen Maldonado, AKA Joseph Allen Schreibvogel, AKA Joe Exotic
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yankovich et al v. Applus Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00720
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen and Amelia Yankovich
Defendant:
Applus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
