Cases 31 - 40 of 103
STAROPOLI et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv02850
Plaintiff:
SUSAN STAROPOLI and AVA STAROPOLI
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RICHARDS v. CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2019cv02807
Plaintiff:
SAMEERAH A. RICHARDS
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, N.A. and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GOCHIN v. MARKOWITZ et al
as 2:2018cv03348
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS BRANCA, LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, ANDREW MARKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK et al
as 2:2018cv01699
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Pennymac Loan Services et al
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
June Garrett
Defendant:
Pennymac Loan Services , Stanford L. Kurland , James K. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kelley v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv01147
Plaintiff:
William M. Kelley
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Chase Bank USA, N.A. , JP Morgan Specialty Mortgage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
FIELDS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02939
Plaintiff:
MERETE FIELDS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
