Cases 31 - 40 of 794
Harris v. Corizon of Florida, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00353
Defendant:
John Doe #1-3, Thomas Reimers, Julie Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell A. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roosevelt Mondesir v. Secretary, Department of Corr.
as 21-10868
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROOSEVELT MONDESIR
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Julie Jones, in her official capacity
Craig Anderson v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-10574
Petitioner / Appellant:
CRAIG ANDERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Julie Jones, Secretary
MERRITT v. JONES et al
as 5:2021cv00037
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, CENTURION OF FLORIDA, STEELE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv20617
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
JULIE JONES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v JONES
as 3:2020cv05974
Petitioner:
FRANK STEVEN DAVIS
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan Portieles v. Florida Department of Corr.
as 20-14072
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS PORTIELES
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Julie Jones, Secretary
Nyka O'Connor v. Shah, et al
as 20-13694
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE JONES, in her individual capacity, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SHAH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NYKA TASSIANT O'CONNOR
Marcus Jenkins v. Attorney General, State of Fl., et al
as 20-13106
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARCUS O'NEAL JENKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JULIE JONES, MARK S. INCH and others
Hickman v. Jones
as 5:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Julie Jones
Plaintiff:
John Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
