Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Robinson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00323
Plaintiff:
Charlie Robinson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby, Orlester Dickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUNNELL v. CROSBY et al
as 4:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY R. TUNNELL
Defendant:
JAMES CROSBY, MARK KAPLAN and JEB BUSH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Margiotti v. Crosby
as 1:2008cv21673
Plaintiff:
Vincent Margiotti
Defendant:
James Crosby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01124
Plaintiff:
Theodore Bowers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Secretary, Department of Corrections, James Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RBC Wealth Management v. Taylor
as 2:2008cv02297
Petitioner:
RBC Wealth Management and RBC Wealth Management
Respondent:
James Crosby Taylor, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CROSBY v. TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. et al
as 2:2008cv77565
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY
Defendant:
TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., TYCO INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Dr. Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 1:2007cv23171
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2007cv00992
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Cole
Respondent:
State Of Florida and James Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
