Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Smith v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00199
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Defendant:
Larry May, Darryl Golden and Nancy Straughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lott v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lott
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Williams v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 4:2009cv04047
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Louise Phillips, Charles Davison and Keith McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby v. Crawford County Detention Center et al
as 2:2008cv02063
Plaintiff:
James Edward Kirby
Defendant:
Crawford County Detention Center, Waterdown, Isreal Burgos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kirby v. Crawford County Detention Center et al
as 4:2008cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Edward Kirby
Defendant:
Crawford County Detention Center, Waterdown, Isreal Burgos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Potts et al
as 5:2008cv00071
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Susan Potts and Debbie Rausch
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Green v. Monticello Arkansas, City of et al
as 5:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Monticello Arkansas, City of, Robert Rosegrant, Steven Stain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2007cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Edward Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Green v. Monticello, City of et al
as 5:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
James Edward Green, Jr
Defendant:
Monticello, City of, Robert Rosegrant, Steven Stain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
