Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Grant v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03306
Plaintiff: Darrien Grant
Defendant: City of New York , Dartray Belk, Jean Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jean Joseph v. Holder
as 14-645
Petitioner: Harry Jean Joseph
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14539
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Jean Jeudy v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3174
Petitioner: JEAN JOSEPH ODYL JEUDY
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Joseph v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05048
Defendant: City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, and Genee Parker
Plaintiff: Jean Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortez v. WMC Mortgage Corp. et al
as 4:2012cv00781
Plaintiff: Jean Joseph Cortez
Defendant: WMC Mortgage Corp., Vantium Capital Inc and EMC Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dudley v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv07735
Plaintiff: Donnie Dudley, Jr.
Defendant: The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Jean Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00376
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jean Frank
as 12-12393
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JEAN JOSEPH FRANK
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff: VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?