Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Holland v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
John D. Holland
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ertl v. Lane (MAG+)
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Ertl
Defendant:
John D. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dupree v. Mitchem et al
as 4:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
John D. Dupree
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Durham v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00839
Plaintiff:
John D. Durham
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Swindall v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00129
Plaintiff:
John D. Swindall
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atchison et al v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc, et al
as 2:2007cv01514
Plaintiff:
Julia Atchison, Julia Atchison, John Wayne Clark and others
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc., John D Reier and Michael J Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Richburg et al v. Drive Financial Services, LP et al
as 2:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
John D Richburg and Melinda Richburg
Defendant:
Drive Financial Services, LP, Drive Financial Services, LP and Ascension Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Harrel, et al v. Veneman, et al
as 2:2003cv00115
Plaintiff:
Welpha Harrel, Jr., James Alexander, Annie Arnold and others
Defendant:
Anne Veneman, John D. Ashcroft and David P. York
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
