Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2016cv02405
Defendant:
Velez, John and Jane Does 1-3, John and Jane Does 11-13 and others
Plaintiff:
Nice and Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. 42 Hotel Cumberland, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03385
Plaintiff:
Ruby Black
Defendant:
42 Hotel Cumberland, LLC , Hampton Inns Management, LLC , Intercoastal Property Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lloyd v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02656
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1-3 and Chaunez Waithe
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Govan v. Soberal et al
as 1:2015cv07279
Defendant:
Police Officer Wilson Alba, Police Officer Jonathan Calderon, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Rhasean Govan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv06559
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Arturo Gomez and P.O. John and Jane Doe 1-3
Plaintiff:
Darlene Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. City of New York, et al.
as 1:2015cv07310
Defendant:
Jesus Colon, City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1-3
Plaintiff:
Edward Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B.L. v. Lamas et al
as 3:2015cv01327
Plaintiff:
B.L.
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas , Steven Glunt , Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samra v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv04874
Defendant:
The City Of New York, The New York City Police Department, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and others
Plaintiff:
Samer M. Samra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02915
Plaintiff:
Simon Ortiz
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02914
Plaintiff:
William D. Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
