Cases 31 - 40 of 819
Diamond Plastics Corporation v. Caudill
as 8:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Diamond Plastics Corporation
Defendant:
John Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Becker v. Dart et al
as 8:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Susanne Becker
Defendant:
Rick Dart and John Marrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Home Instead, Inc. v. Rochester Senior Care, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Home Instead, Inc.
Defendant:
Rochester Senior Care, LLC, Sarah K Pacchetti, John M Pacchetti and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 8:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. Locust
as 8:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
John Locust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nine Stories, LLC v. The City of David City et al
as 8:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Nine Stories, LLC
Defendant:
The City of David City, Alan Zavodny, Dana Trowbridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chisano v. Newton et al
as 4:2023cv03133
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chisano
Defendant:
John Newton, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Colston et al v. Ameritas Holding Company et al
as 4:2023cv03137
Plaintiff:
Amber Colston, Willis Bramwell and Roseann Blessing
Defendant:
Ameritas Holding Company, The Board of Directors of Ameritas Holding Company, The Ameritas 401(k) Retirement Plan Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Stratman v. USA
as 8:2023cv00364
Petitioner:
John J. Stratman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tyler v. Doe
as 8:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
