Cases 31 - 40 of 213
Williams v. Arpaio
as 2:2016cv02507
Plaintiff:
Casey R Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02352
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dion v. Ashley et al
as 2:2016cv02250
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Dion
Defendant:
Unknown Ashley and Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv01931
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ramsey
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jacobsen v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv01756
Plaintiff:
Craig Leslie Jacobsen, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services, Unknown Party and Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Maricopa County Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2016cv01711
Plaintiff:
Garry Brian Ferguson
Defendant:
Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph Arpaio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirro v. Corizon et al
as 4:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mirro, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon, Arizona Department of Corrections, GEO Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derello et al v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Douglas Wayne Derello, Jr. and Felix Victor German
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio, Unknown Rosales, Pamela S Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gurule v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2016cv00561
Plaintiff:
Miguel Alejandro Gurule
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkpatrick v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gary B Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department and Joseph Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
