Cases 31 - 40 of 80
TURNER, JR. v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2020cv00197
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEAVER COUNTY, KEVIN J. RANSOM and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Petitioner:
JAMES R. TURNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner, Jr. v. Ransom et al
as 1:2020cv00213
Petitioner:
James R. Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin J. Ransom and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WARNER et al v. SWEPI, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. ZINK, JOHN L. STEWART, GILDA GIANCOLA and others
Defendant:
SWEPI, LP and SHELL ENERGY HOLDING GP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEOPLES v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2019cv05242
Petitioner:
OMEGA PEOPLES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEVIN J. RANSOM and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harding v. Ransom et al
as 3:2019cv01882
Respondent:
Kevin J. Ransom and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ryan Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROOKS v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2019cv01243
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEVIN J. RANSOM and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY
Petitioner:
JAMES BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IFS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. TAILORED CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 5:2018cv03983
Defendant:
TAILORED CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, INC. and KEVIN J. RODECK
Plaintiff:
IFS INDUSTRIES, INC.
ISAAC v. FARRELL AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. ISAAC
Defendant:
FARRELL AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2021
Willner v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2017cv01924
Plaintiff:
Brian Willner
Defendant:
Luzerne County , C.O. Wujack , C.O. Delany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMONT v. CONNER et al
as 2:2017cv03262
Plaintiff:
P. STEPHEN LAMONT
Defendant:
KEVIN J. CONNER and CONNER AND ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
