Cases 31 - 40 of 622
Killian v. King et al
as 2:2023cv11577
Plaintiff:
Travor Austin Killian and Trevor Austin Killian
Defendant:
Mat King, St. Clair County Sheriff's Department, Port Huron Police Department and others
Cage v. Beard et al
as 2:2023cv11575
Defendant:
Jerome Waefield, Curtis Beard, Jill Kline and others
Plaintiff:
Landis Cage
King v. City of Detroit
as 5:2023cv11558
Plaintiff:
AMEER KING
Defendant:
Detroit Department of Transportation and DETROIT CITY OF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Moore et al v. Washington et al
as 5:2023cv11506
Plaintiff:
John Moore, II, Nazem Saad, Kenneth Matlock and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Mark King, Adrian Dirschell and others
Gable Services, LLC v. Elkins et al
as 2:2023cv11451
Plaintiff:
Gable Services, LLC
Defendant:
Juli Ann Elkins, Staff Heads, LLC, Dominick King and others
King #280752 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony King #280752
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Erway, Kendra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker #747025 v. King
as 1:2023cv00596
Petitioner:
Larry Walker #747025
Respondent:
Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Worthy #415988 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Jerry Jemar Worthy #415988
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Party #1, Sherri L. Burt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Chapman & Associates, P.C. v. YesCare Corp et al
as 2:2023cv11210
Plaintiff:
Chapman & Associates, P.C. d/b/a Chapman Law Group and Chapman & Associates, P.C. Doing business as Chapman Law Group
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, Isaac Lefkowitz and Scott King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
