Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson, Robert Muir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KAUFMAN v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv04086
Plaintiff:
JAY KAUFMAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. HOTEL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01640
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , AMAZEMENT MUSIC , KASHIF MUSIC and others
Defendant:
HOTEL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATES LLC, WILLIAM F. GREEN and HOWARD KAUFMAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
CURRY v. CO. LANGLEY et al
as 3:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
KENDALL CURRY
Defendant:
CO LANGLEY, PA MILLER, PA KAUFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLASS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
KAREEM GLASS
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, DR. MAHMUD, MS. SWANHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARBIERO v. KAUFMAN et al
as 2:2012cv06869
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY V. BARBIERO
Defendant:
GERALD S. KAUFMAN and GERALD S. KAUFMAN CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
KAUFMAN v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05096
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE S. KAUFMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FIELDS et al v. ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2012cv04855
Plaintiff:
DESMOND FIELDS and JENIFER KAUFMAN
Defendant:
ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, ALEXIS OUSLEY, SCHOOL DISTRICTS INSURANCE CONSORTIUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaufman v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv01302
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kaufman
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyers v. Alexander et al
as 1:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Meyers
Defendant:
Gary D. Alexander, Constance L. Swan, Martha Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
