Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Bynum v. Kerr et al
as 2:2018cv14078
Defendant:
David Messer, C. Elliot, D. Corbin and others
Plaintiff:
J'Von Decarro Bynum
Brown #884273 v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv01362
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Guestfellia, Unknown Gardner and others
Plaintiff:
Ade Brown #884273
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Trump et al
as 2:2018mc50217
Defendant:
Stephen A. Smith, John Anderson, Daniel Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Adams
Odom #228931 v. Christiansen et al
as 1:2018cv00081
Plaintiff:
Anthoine Deshaw Odom #228931
Defendant:
Unknown Blair, Unknown Christiansen, Unknown Beaushane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. S. Kerr
as 5:2018cv10229
Plaintiff:
Crescencio Longoria
Defendant:
S. Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartlett v. Hannah et al
as 5:2017cv14163
Plaintiff:
Alan M. Bartlett
Defendant:
John Hannah, Jr., Christina Phillis, Daniel Fererra and others
Frank W. Kerr Company, Debtor in possession v. Walnut Associates 1, L.L.C. d/b/a West Grange Pharmacy
as 2:2016cv14307
Plaintiff:
Frank W. Kerr Company, Debtor in possession
Defendant:
Walnut Associates 1, L.L.C. d/b/a West Grange Pharmacy
Counter_claimant:
Walnut Associates 1, L.L.C. d/b/a West Grange Pharmacy
Counter_defendant:
Frank W. Kerr Company, Debtor in possession
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pugh #492273 et al v. Trierweiler et al
as 1:2016cv01391
Plaintiff:
Terrance Pugh #492273 and Robert Wright #674195
Defendant:
Tony Trierweiler, John Davids, Dan Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh et al v. Trierwilder et al
as 2:2016cv14132
Plaintiff:
Terrance Pugh and Robert Wright
Defendant:
Tony Trierwilder, John Davids, Macauley and others
FRANK W. KERR COMPANY v. SAV-MOR FRANCHISING, INC.
as 2:2016cv13880
Plaintiff:
FRANK W. KERR COMPANY
Defendant:
SAV-MOR FRANCHISING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
