Cases 31 - 40 of 76
INDOCARB CORPORATION, INC. v. MADHAVAN et al
as 2:2019cv00889
Defendant:
SANTHOSH KUMAR MADHAVAN and INDOCARB AC LLC
Plaintiff:
INDOCARB CORPORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WOOD v. SAROJ AND MANJU INVESTMENTS PHILADELPHIA LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02820
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOOD
Defendant:
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, MANISH SINGH and SAROJ AND MANJU INVESTMENTS PHILADELPHIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KARPAIYAN et al v. INTERNATIONAL SOS et al
as 2:2019cv02259
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARPAIYAN and KARUPAIYAN CONSULTING INC
Defendant:
KUMAR MANGALA, INTERNATIONAL SOS, GREGORY HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORGERSEN v. KEATING et al
as 2:2019cv00410
Defendant:
VINAY KUMAR, EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP., PETER M. WILVER and others
Plaintiff:
DALLAS TORGERSEN
FLYTE v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al
as 5:2019cv00703
Defendant:
PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., KISHOR KUMAR DEDANIA and COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON
Plaintiff:
KYLE L. FLYTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manindra Kumar v. Kulick and Soffa Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Jonathan Chou, Kulick and Soffa Industries, Inc. and Fusen Chen
Plaintiff:
Manindra Kumar, Dennis Dandeles and THOMAS WALSH
PIERRE v. CARTER et al
as 2:2018cv05288
Defendant:
USA UNIVERSAL HAIR, MUKESH KUMAR, ALL AMERICAN CENTRAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONY PIERRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
KUMAR et al v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2018cv01027
Plaintiff:
RAKESH KUMAR, RUPA KUMARI and KULENDRA PRASAD
Defendant:
AMBASSADOR POOL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., AMBASSADOR POOLS, INC., MAURICE MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patel v. Lowe
as 4:2018cv01548
Petitioner:
Jitendar Kumar Patel
Respondent:
Craig Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
