Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Randle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2019cv00630
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Doe and Does Commissary; Federal Government; Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leodis Randle v. Genise Key, et al
as 19-2695
Defendant / Appellee:
Genise Key and Berry Sims, Circuit Court Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leodis Randle
Randle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2019cv00547
Defendant:
Pulaski County Detention Center, Manger Austin, Pulaski County and others
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leodis Randle v. D. Mussadiq, et al
as 19-2213
Defendant / Appellee:
Lon Watson, Deputy (Originally named as L Watson), Charles Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County (Originally named as Doc Holiday), Seth McKanna, Sergeant, Pulaski County Detention Center (Originally named as McKanna) and others
Defendant:
Williams, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Center, Dedra Hoof, Gibson, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leodis Randle
Randle v. Does
as 4:2019cv00407
Defendant:
Does State Government, Federal Government
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Does
as 4:2019cv00116
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Does Federal Courthouse, Federal Court Policy, Insurance, Justice System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leodis Randle v. Does, et al
as 19-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leodis Randle
Defendant / Appellee:
Collean Barnhill, Public Defender and Does
Randle v. Doe
as 4:2019cv00010
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
US District Court Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Austin et al
as 4:2019cv00011
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Does Probation Officer Manager; Police Station Officers; Pulaski County Jail Officers, Justice System and Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Kelley
as 4:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
USA and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
