Cases 31 - 40 of 4,027
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
THEMA JOHNSON
Defendant:
PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEE v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LEE
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE, TODD BICKLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WEBB v. HARPER
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
DEREK LEE WEBB
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. County of Lycoming et al
as 4:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Turner
Defendant:
County of Lycoming, Lycoming County Prison, Brad A. Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAYNER v. THE COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv05187
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS LEE RAYNER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, DETECTIVE HAROLD DUTTER and THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SUMMERS v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00318
Petitioner:
DARRELL LEE-LAMO SUMMERS
Respondent:
FCI LORETTO WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BITTAR v. LEE et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
SHAFIK BITTAR
Defendant:
WALLACE L. LEE and STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
