Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Michael Oliver v. Warden, et al
as 19-12886
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA MIREE, LEON BOLLING, CHERYL PRICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DARNELL OLIVER
Scott v. Golson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00486
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Warden Thomas, Co. Officer Young and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Melton et al
as 2:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, John Hutton and Cordaro Melton
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baisden v. Bolling (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Leon Bolling, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLeod v. Bolling et al
as 2:2019cv00571
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Lieutenant Thrasher, Deputy Warden Cheryl Price and others
Plaintiff:
Julius McCleod, Jr and Julius McLeod, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flagg v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00157
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daveon Cathey v. Leon Bolling, et al
as 19-10800
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVEON L. CATHEY
Respondent / Appellee:
LEON BOLLING and ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE
Byrd v. Bolling et al
as 7:2019cv00199
Respondent:
Warden Leon Bolling and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner:
William Jody Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne-Bey v. Price et al
as 2:2018cv02054
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Ruth Naglich, Asst Warden Cheryl Price and others
Plaintiff:
Darrow Payne-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Price et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv02057
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Ruth Naglich and Cheryl Price
Plaintiff:
Darrow Payne and Darrow Payne-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
