Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Estate of Glenn Swindell et al v. County of Sonoma
as 4:2015cv00897
Plaintiff:
Estate of Glenn Swindell , Sarah Swindell , G.S. and others
Defendant:
County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M.S. v. County of Lake et al
as 3:2014cv05170
Plaintiff:
M.S. a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, and guardian, JEFFREY SMITH , JEFFREY SMITH and ELIZABETH SMITH
Defendant:
County of Lake, Francisco Rivero, WEAVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv03008
Plaintiff:
Linda Ann Wright
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Robert Gates, Eric Shinseki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Furnace v. Gipson et al
as 1:2014cv00814
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, M.S. Robicheaux and M. Sexton
Plaintiff:
Edward T Furnace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Gipson et al
as 1:2014cv00610
Plaintiff:
William Roy Bonner
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, M. Jennings, M. Gaboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Star Fabrics Inc v. Heavenly Couture Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00991
Defendant:
Does, Heavenly Couture Inc, Jainson's International Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Heavenly Couture Inc, Jainson's International Inc., KNY Clothing Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Star Fabrics Inc
Cross Claimant:
Universal Dyeing and Printing Inc
J.N.M.S.U. v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2013cv06827
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
J.N. M.S. U.
In re Parthemore
as 4:2013cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ira D. Parthemore
Defendant:
B. Kissel, J. Soltanian, L. Reaves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moses v. Innoprise Software Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05271
Plaintiff:
Mark Moses
Defendant:
Innoprise Software Inc., Dennis Harward, Ann Harward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
