Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Wishkin v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01286
Plaintiff:
Star Wishkin
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIENES v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA DIENES
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC, FACEBOOK OPERATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLEVENGER v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
LAUREL CLEVENGER
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK HOLDINGS, LLC, FACEBOOK OPERATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELANSARI v. META, INC.
as 2:2021cv05325
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Defendant:
META, INC. doing business as FACEBOOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
BUTTENHEIM v. BOOS
as 2:2019cv05226
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BOOS
Plaintiff:
META BUTTENHEIM and META BUTTENHEIM doing business as AIRMARKETING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
SIMMONS v. META BANK & ACE
as 2:2019cv01287
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
META BANK & ACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTTENHEIM v. DIRECT AIRWAY, INC.
as 2:2019cv02487
Plaintiff:
META BUTTENEHIM and META BUTTENHEIM
Defendant:
DIRECT AIRWAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTTENHEIM v. BOOS
as 2:2019cv02488
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BOOS
Plaintiff:
META BUTTENHEIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. UNIRUSH, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv05996
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JONES
Defendant:
UNIRUSH, LLC , RUSH COMMUNICATIONS, LLC , RUSH COMMUNICATIONS OF NYC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PEW v. TORMA et al
as 2:2014cv00984
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOANNE TORMA, DAVE ROBERTS, T'SHANNA KYLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
