Cases 31 - 40 of 854
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kirk D Miller and Erika Miller
Defendant:
Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vanderburgh v. Miller
as 2:2023cv00255
Defendant:
Mrs. Meegan Michelle Vanderburgh
Respondent:
Daniel White and Arminda Miller
Petitioner:
Meegan Michelle Vanderburgh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Thurston County et al
as 3:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ross Miller
Defendant:
Thurston County, Nicolas Andersen and Joel Nault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estes v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Jacy Joe Estes
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Curtis et al v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Aila Curtis, Ciera Agee, Alison Archer and others
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, PeaceHealth, Liz Dunne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
