Cases 31 - 40 of 498
Moore v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00456
Petitioner:
Terell Moore
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Alfaro et al
as 1:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Javon Moore
Defendant:
Carolina Alfaro and Caro Hair Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Kuriloff v. InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Floyd Kuriloff
Counter Claimant:
InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Matthew Moore, Mark Moore, Kimberly Moore and others
Intervenor Defendant:
GS Capital Partners LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Virginia Department of Corrections
as 7:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Kariem Moore
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Portsmouth Sherrif's Department et al
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Veronica M. Johnson
Defendant:
Portsmouth Sherrif's Department, Judge Douglass B. Ottinger, Judge William S. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
