Cases 31 - 40 of 375
Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 14-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, HECTOR JOYNER, JOHN EDWARDS, Case Worker/SCU and others
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SEXTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
KEITH JAMES SEXTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, CHARLES E SAMUELS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
WHITNEY v. WALKER
as 5:2013cv00347
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WHITNEY
Defendant:
WALKER, UNKNOWN, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouman v. Broome et al
as 5:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Chad Darrell Bouman
Defendant:
Brian Broome, Ruben A. Blair, Marcus Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Samuels et al.
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
David Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harley G. Lappin, Scott A. Middlebrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Denooyer v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Todd Denooyer
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, J. Acebal, Sarah Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denooyer v. Pastrana et al
as 6:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Todd Denooyer
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, J. Acebal, Sarah Buggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Perotti v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 13-1846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN W. PEROTTI
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, Warden, Individually and as Warden of Milan FDC, T. K. COZZA-RHODES, MELODY MORRIS, Individually and as DCA Secretary and Notary and others
Defendant:
DAN STECH, et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
