Cases 31 - 40 of 41
CAT Express, Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
as 1:2017cv08380
Plaintiff:
CAT Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AON Consulting, Inc. v. Marsh, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07218
Defendant:
Marsh, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
Plaintiff:
AON Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Russell et al v. Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
as 3:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
W. Douglas Russell and Zachary F. Brandau
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Kolkhorst
as 1:2017cv03975
Plaintiff:
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Kolkhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC v. Connors et al
as 1:2016cv10248
Plaintiff:
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas P. Connors, Jr. and Sapers & Wallack, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Payne v. Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
as 1:2012cv00001
Counter Defendant:
Lockton Risk Services, Inc. and Sara K. Payne
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trinity Yachts, LLC v. Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
Trinity Yachts, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Trinity Yachts, LLC v. Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02587
Plaintiff:
Trinity Yachts, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Coon v. Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
as 3:2011cv00463
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Coon
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mack v. Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Mack
Defendant:
Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. and Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
