Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Banks v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01318
Plaintiff: Marie Banks
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vision Bank v. Jordan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02065
Plaintiff: Vision Bank
Defendant: Lee Roy Jordan and Mary Banks Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21487
Plaintiff: Mary Banks and Betty Colston
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Kelly Orthopaedic Sales, LP and KOS Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02562
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Banks Donatto
as 2:2011mj01196
Defendant: Frances Marie Banks Donatto (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Frances Marie Banks Donatto
as 2:2011mj01196
Defendant: Frances Marie Banks Donatto (1)
Plaintiff: USA
Gillian Abbott et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceutical LP et al
as 2:2011cv04413
Plaintiff: Gillian Abbott, Jeffid Aff, Norma Alexander and others
Defendant: Astra USA Inc, AstraZeneca AB, AstraZeneca LP and others
Diane Marie Banks, et al v. Kondaur Capital Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-6025
Debtor: In re: Edward D. Banks and Diane Marie Banks
Plaintiff - Appellant: Diane Marie Banks and Edward D. Banks
Defendant - Appellee: Kondaur Capital Corporation
Defendant: Shapiro & Zielke, LLP, formerly known as Shapiro Nordmeyer & Zielke
Banks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00718
Plaintiff: Mary Banks and Betty Colston
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Kelly Orthopaedic Sales, LP and KOS Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?