Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
MIDSTATE MALL LLC v. DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
as 2:2020cv12699
Plaintiff:
MIDSTATE MALL LLC
Defendant:
DSW SHOE WAREHOUSE, INC.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
RAMSEY INTERSTATE CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Drew v. State of New York
as 20-705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith Drew
Defendant:
State of New York and Supervisor John Doe, Offender Rehabilitation Counselor for Keith Drew, Midstate Correctional Facility, December 2017
Defendant / Appellee:
Diana Estwick, Senior Parole Officer, Division of Parole and Medjine Medard, Parole Officer, Division of Parole
Lopez v. Midstate Collection Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ashley Lopez
Defendant:
Midstate Collection Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dunigan v. Redman et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Hogan Transports, Inc., Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc., hurrah redman and others
Plaintiff:
micheal dunigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierre v. Hartford Auto Group Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01872
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Pierre
Defendant:
Hartford Auto Group, Inc., Straits Turnpike Automotive, LLC, Straits Turnpike Automotive, LLC doing business as Mid State Mitsubishi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Hassell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00967
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Hassell
Defendant:
Louise P Hytken, Ramonna Nottinger, Phil Umphress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
