Cases 31 - 40 of 78
MORRIS v. CROWDER
as 5:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
MIMS MICHAEL MORRIS, JR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MATTHEW B CROWDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Crowder
as 1:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Mims Michael Morris and Mims Michael Morris, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew B. Crowder
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grogan et al v. Diaz et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan and Tommy Mims
Defendant:
Luz Diaz, Devin Nuckles, Veronica Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, CHARLES MIMS, CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
DARANTAE CARTER
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CRUMBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macri et al v. Brower et al
as 1:2021cv03240
Plaintiff:
Alicia White, Jerri Macri, Rebecca Macri and others
Defendant:
James Brower, Sheriff Gene Scarbrough and Shane Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00032
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, Deputy Warden SHROPSHIRE, Deputy Warden MIMS and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Deputy Warden RALPH SHROPSHIRE, Sergeant FAVORS and others
Plaintiff:
DEANTWAN MONTE ALLEN, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00016
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, RALPH SHROPSHIRE and CHARLES MIMS
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Emmons et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Defendant:
Shawn Emmons, Ralph Shropshire and Charles Mims
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. (Vizion) Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
