Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Fritz v. Johnson et al
as 9:2014cv03944
Plaintiff:
William Edward Fritz
Defendant:
Sgt Johnson, Ofc Mims, Lt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Kolb et al
as 3:2014cv02955
Plaintiff:
Rodney Coleman
Defendant:
Wade S Kolb, Deborah T. Nielson, Mr Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roberson v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01872
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lamar Roberson
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Anthony J Padula, James Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Castello v. Mims et al
as 4:2013cv01798
Plaintiff:
Claudia Gomez Castello
Defendant:
Olanta, The Town of and Mathew Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spears v. South Carolina Dept of Corr et al
as 6:2013cv00555
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept of Corr, Ernest Mims, Edward Lucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mims v. USA
as 1:2012cv02977
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Spears v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv03175
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Spears, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Jon E Ozmint, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bermea-Cepeda v. Chartier et al
as 8:2011cv01231
Plaintiff:
Juan Bermea-Cepeda
Defendant:
Chartier, Mims, Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacchus v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Defendant:
Lt Scarborough, Lt Richardson, Lt Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
