Cases
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00299
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1251
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fleuranvil v. Flagstar Bank FSB et al
as 1:2011cv04604
Plaintiff: Alfred Fleuranvil
Defendant: Flagstar Bank FSB, Morris, Hardwick, & Schneider, McCalla Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Archer v. Flagstar, FSB et al
as 1:2011cv01440
Plaintiff: Aminah Archer
Defendant: Flagstar, FSB and Morris, Hardwick, Schneider
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv00265
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Strange v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv00619
Plaintiff: Gregory Strange
Defendant: First Horizon Home Loan Corp., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Johnie R. Muncy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Type: Civil Rights None
Mooney v. Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00090
Plaintiff: Connie Mooney, Connie Mooney and Connie Mooney
Defendant: Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. and Morris Hardwick Schneider, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Canada v. Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03866
Plaintiff: Anthony Canada, Anthony Canada and Anthony Canada
Defendant: Homeowners Mortgage Enterprises, Inc. and Morris Hardwick Schneider, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?