Cases 31 - 40 of 566
Martin v. Revelry LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Erin N Martin
Defendant:
Revelry LLC and Kristina H Weeks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. Bowns et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Nathan Lamar Jones
Respondent:
N Bowns, W Davis, Pressly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirkwood et al v. Buckner et al
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Shali Renee Kirkwood, Jack Paul Kirkwood and S.R.K.
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Remigia T. Coleman, Tina Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Hetrick
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Davis William Nelson and William N. Davis
Respondent:
Richard Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimes v. Noe et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Grimes
Defendant:
Guy Noe, Mitchell, N Estelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cunningham et al v. QBE Speciality Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
William M. Cunningham, Jr. and Kathryn N. Cunningham
Defendant:
QBE Speciality Insurance Company and Daniel T. Donohue, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Caffey v. United States of America et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Rodney N. Caffey
Defendant:
Health Services Inc., Shabnam Guard, Publix Supermarkets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Federal Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
