Cases 31 - 40 of 48
State of Colorado, The v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2020cv01461
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, The
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler, R.D. James, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Public Lands Council, U.S. Poultry & Egg Association, Leading Builders of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
State of New York et al v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2019cv11673
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, City of New York, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Public Lands Council, American Petroleum Institute, National Alliance of Forest Owners and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2019cv03006
Defendant:
Andrew R Wheeler, US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife, South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, North Carolina Coastal Federation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Public Lands Council, American Petroleum Institute, National Association of Home Builders and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Renewable Fuels Association, et al v. EPA
as 19-1220
Petitioner:
Growth Energy, National Farmers Union, American Coalition for Ethanol and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Renewable Fuels Association, et al v. EPA
as 19-1201
Petitioner:
Growth Energy, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, National Farmers Union and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
SC Coastal Conservation v. Andrew Wheeler
as 19-1136
Undetermined:
NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL, AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION, U.S. POULTRY AND EGG ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL FEDERATION, FRIENDS OF THE RAPPAHANNOCK, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RYAN FISHER, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and others
State Of New York v. Pruitt et al
as 1:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
State Of New York , State of California , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
E. Scott Pruitt , United States Environmental Protection Agency , Ryan A. Fisher and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League et al v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League , Charleston Waterkeeper , American Rivers and others
Defendant:
E Scott Pruitt , United States Environmental Protection Agency, The , Ryan Fisher and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 1:2018cv01048
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and National Wildlife Federation
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency , E. Scott Pruitt , Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor_defendant:
American Farm Bureau Federation , American Forest & Paper Association , American Petroleum Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Americans for Clean Energy, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1005
Petitioner:
Americans for Clean Energy, American Coalition for Ethanol, Biotechnology Innovation Organization and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers and American Petroleum Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
