Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 551
Jordan v. NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner et al
as 1:2023fp00307
Plaintiff: Michael Jordan
Defendant: NH Department of Corrections, Commissioner, NH State Prison for Men, Warden, Paula Mattis and others
Not Classified By Court: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortune v. NH Department of Corrections, Medical Director et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: John Fortune
Defendant: NH Department of Corrections, Medical Director and NH Department of Corrections, Dental Director
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only), NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only), NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden
as 1:2023fp00276
Petitioner: Mark Heath
Respondent: NH State Prison for Men, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cotoni v. Hollins et al
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff: Matthew Cotoni
Defendant: Chris Hollins and NH Department of Corrections, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stow v. Davis
as 23-1415
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTON J. STOW
Defendant / Appellee: ANNE DAVIS, Dr., Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men and ANNE DAVIS, Doctor, Phd., Education Principal and Supervisor of NHDOC Library Services, NH State Prison for Men
Defendant: GEORGE CORRIVEAU, Nurse, Northern NH Correctional Facility
Interested Party: JOHN M. FORMELLA, NH Attorney General and NH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Marin v. NH State Prison for Women, Warden
as 1:2023cv00265
Petitioner: Katlyn Marin
Respondent: NH State Prison for Women, Warden
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodham v. Grafton County Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00195
Petitioner: Grace Woodham
Respondent: Grafton County Department of Corrections
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. NH, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00245
Petitioner: Edgar Clifford Avery, Jr.
Respondent: NH, State of
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodham v. NH, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff: Grace Woodham
Defendant: NH, State of and John Doe
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rivera v. NH State Prison for Men, Warden
as 1:2023cv00226
Petitioner: Ernesto Rivera
Respondent: NH State Prison for Men, Warden and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Not Classified By Court: NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Habeas (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?