Cases 31 - 40 of 308
Jackson v. Norris
as 3:2022cv03008
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
Chief David Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Norris
as 3:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
David Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Norris
as 3:2022cv03007
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
Chief David Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Norris
as 4:2022cv02919
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
David Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Norris
as 3:2022cv02556
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
David Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Norris
as 3:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jackson
Defendant:
David Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doreen Viertell et al v. Hacienda La Puente Unified School District et al
as 2:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Doreen Viertell, Jennifer Padilla, Nelly C. Corcio and others
Defendant:
Hacienda La Puente Unified School District, Dr. Alfonso Jimenez, Jeffrey De La Torre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Miller v. Meda et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Norris Dajon Miller
Defendant:
Janet Meda, Jovita Villanueva, V. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miller v. Sanchez, et al.
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Norris Dajon Miller
Defendant:
Ruby Sanchez, Janet Meda, Laura Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dana Gold et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2014cv05373
Plaintiff:
Dana Gold, Tammy Emery, Russell Dornon and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Benjamin Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
