Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Stanley v. Soden et al
as 3:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
Norris Edward Stanley, Sr.
Defendant:
Soden, Andrew Kolp, Marie Bristow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Norris et al
as 2:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Capt Norris, 1st SGT Guyan, LT. McRae and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Adcock et al
as 2:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeffrey Ryan Adcock, Corporal Vaughn, LT Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Franzen et al
as 2:2017cv00450
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
Franzen, Knewgen, Barbara Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Adcock, et al
as 2:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Keon Jamall Madden
Defendant:
SGT Adcock, Corporal Foster, Nurse Dobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Gary Norris Plumbing, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00355
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant:
Gary Norris Plumbing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Jaderborg v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Jaderborg
Defendant:
Capt. Houston Norris, Mr. Mackey, B. Mead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Grims et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Phil Grims, Major Lorri Rohme, Captain Huston Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prasad v. Norris et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Defendant:
Sandra C. Norris, Remki Banerjee, Sgt. McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison, et al. v. County of Fairfax, VA
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gerard Morrison, Kit Hessel, Glenn Mason and others
Defendant:
County of Fairfax, VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
