Cases 31 - 40 of 5,908
RAVEN et al v. SCHREINER et al
as 2:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAVEN, LOYOLA ENERGY, LLC and ELLICOTT, LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL AND BRENDA SCHREINER, BRENCO, OIL, INC., LARRY ELKUS, ESQ., D/B/A LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE M. ELKUS, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
M & B Oil, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co, et al
as 21-3817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M & B Oil, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company and City of St. Louis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ghauri v. MANGUM STORE, INC. et al
as 4:2021cv03699
Plaintiff:
Bilal Ahmad Ghauri
Defendant:
MANGUM STORE, INC., CALDER OPERATIONS, LLC, CHANTILLY OIL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
North Side Oil Inc v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
as 4:2021cv01156
Plaintiff:
NORTH SIDE OIL INC, dba Gas Mart and North Side Oil Inc doing business as Gas Mart
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service and United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
M & B Oil, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co, et al
as 21-8008
Petitioner:
M & B Oil, Inc.
Respondent:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company and City of St. Louis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
