Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Espina et al v. Pinnacle Security, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02166
Plaintiff:
Laura Espina and Omar Perez
Defendant:
Pinnacle Security, LLC and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reilly et al v. Pinnacle Security, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01580
Plaintiff:
Keith Reilly , Troy Helton , Melanie Helton and others
Defendant:
Pinnacle Security, LLC, Monitronics International, Inc., Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01055
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. $38,077.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2014cv00945
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$38,077.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Omar Perez
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. Forti-Ahorrio et al
as 3:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. , Sanrio, Inc. , Disney Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Noel Forti-Ahorrio, Alberto Arango-Grinan , Bienvenido Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02255
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carlos Perez-Flores v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73147
Petitioner:
CARLOS OMAR PEREZ-FLORES, AKA Carlos Omar Perez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Perez-Prado v. US
as 13-1460
Petitioner - Appellant:
OMAR PEREZ-PRADO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Edwin Omar Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Omar Perez-Prado v. USA
as 3:2012cv01455
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Omar Perez-Prado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
