Cases 31 - 40 of 885
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lourie v. Papa John's International, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04320
Plaintiff:
Barry Lourie
Defendant:
Papa John's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Flach v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2023cv07069
Plaintiff:
Tyler Flach
Defendant:
County of Nassau, C.O. Anthony Lipp, CPL. Richard Nouss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAPA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
TYLER JAMES PAPA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. CHILI'S, INC.
as 2:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
CHILI'S, INC.
Consolidated Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Deli Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. PAPA MURPHY'S HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
PAPA MURPHY'S HOLDINGS, INC., PAPA MURPHY'S INTERNATIONAL, LLC, MURPHY'S MARKETING SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
O'Dell v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07992
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Wang v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08041
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Kent et al v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Coffman v. Desktop Metal, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07900
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc., Ric Fulop, Bilal Zuberi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
