Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 67
BURKES v. WALTON, et al
as 2:2012cv01237
Plaintiff: DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant: JOHN WALTON, STEVEN J. CMAR, PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01234
Plaintiff: DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant: JOHN WALTON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON BOARD, TOM DAVERSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01236
Plaintiff: DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant: JOHN WALTON, MELISSA BOGGS, PRISON BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURKES v. WALTON et al
as 2:2012cv01235
Plaintiff: DUSTIN L. BURKES
Defendant: JOHN WALTON, STEVEN J. CMAR, ERIC SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. PETCO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04353
Plaintiff: DOUG VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant: PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC., DONNA JOHNSON, BARBARA BUCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINLAY v. POTTEIGER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00499
Petitioner: IAN A. FINLAY
Respondent: MICHAEL C. POTTEIGER and JOHN W. PECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHADLE v. WENEROWICZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00081
Petitioner: DAVID SHADLE
Respondent: MIKE WENEROWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and JON PECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01982
Plaintiff: Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant: John E. Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAHL v. DUGAN et al
as 2:2011cv01231
Plaintiff: MARY DAHL
Defendant: SHANNON DUGAN , WILLIAM PECK, IV, DAVID M. SPEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Samuel et al
as 1:2011cv01777
Plaintiff: Edgar L. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant: Andrew Samuel , Charles Pearson , Clifford DeBaptiste and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?