Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Poulos v. Cure Medical, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Timothy Palmer, Cure Medical, LLC, Ann Elizabeth Kenowsky and others
Plaintiff:
George Poulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Embassy Winchester, LLC
as 2:2020cv06426
Plaintiff:
Marsha Palmer
Defendant:
Embassy Winchester, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Palmer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05462
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Montea Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Sheldon
as 1:2020cv02124
Respondent:
Warden Ed Sheldon
Petitioner:
David D. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2020op45231
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., Eastern Shore Neurology Clinic, Inc., Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Poarch Band of Creek Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Daphne, Alabama v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 1:2020op45227
Defendant:
H.D. Smith LLC, Par Pharmaceutical Companies Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Daphne, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ted Williams Enterprises, LLC et al v. Palmer
as 4:2020cv01018
Defendant:
Juli Palmer
Plaintiff:
Trustee Debra Lawlor, Trustee Karen Webber and Ted Williams Enterprises, LLC as Plan Sponsor and Plan Administrator of the Ted Williams Enterprises, LLC Defined Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Palmer v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01560
Plaintiff:
Richard M Palmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
