Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Robin Parham v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00481
Defendant:
CBC Innovis, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robin Parham
La Fountaine et al v. McKesson et al
as 3:2013cv05841
Plaintiff:
James La Fountaine , Earl Layne , Daniel LeBlanc and others
Defendant:
Corporation McKesson and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert Bishop Parham v. Ralph Diaz
as 2:2013cv06692
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Robert Bishop Parham
Bennett et al v. Organon USA Inc.
as 3:2013cv03606
Plaintiff:
Heather Carlena Bennett , Tirah Parham Brown , Martina Andrea Chadwick and others
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc. , Organon Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Annie Parham v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2013cv01460
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and others
Plaintiff:
Annie Parham
Axtle et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2012cv06404
Plaintiff:
Ismael Eduardo Axtle, Mario Ochoa Gonzalez and Anthony McGee
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Greg Ahern, Carla Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2012cv02752
Defendant:
Howard B Abbott, Howard B Abbott, Joseph Bartholomew and others
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Robert Bishop Parham v. Mike McDonald
as 2:2011cv08479
Respondent:
Mike McDonald
Petitioner:
Robert Bishop Parham
Baker v. Ensign
as 3:2011cv02060
Plaintiff:
Cameron Baker
Defendant:
Jason Ensign
Cross_claimant:
Jason Ensign
Cross_defendant:
Cameron Baker
Thirdparty_defendant:
San Diego, City of , William Landsdowne , David Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
