Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stallworth v. Bibb County, Alabama et al
as 7:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Stallworth
Defendant:
Bibb County, Alabama , Keith Hannah , Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners et al
as 2:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners, Carrington, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Dixon v. Kimbrell et al
as 2:2013cv01327
Plaintiff:
Corene Dixon
Defendant:
Shawn Kimbrell , Jerry Wiley and Eric Poole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Poole v. Felder et al
as 2:2013cv01265
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Poole
Defendant:
Victorrus Felder, Morris Rogers and Cheryl Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lowe et al
as 2:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Byron Devon Jackson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Lowe, Eddins, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Life Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Richard Poole
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Keach v. Poole et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Keach
Defendant:
Rodney A. Poole and Armory Capital Mobile I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv04136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
