Cases 31 - 40 of 1,182
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
C. Finley v. Karen Bass et al
as 2:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
C. Finley
Defendant:
Karen Bass, Eunisses Hernandez, Paul Krekorian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv02378
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Dr. Mann and Dr. Sabben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Sabbeen et al
as 4:2024cv02379
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Sabbeen and Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) White v. Department of State Hospitals et al
as 1:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Rodney White
Respondent:
Department of State Hospitals, Stephanie Clendenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Patino v. Price
as 1:2024cv00240
Petitioner:
Phillip Patino
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
4th and Main, LLC v. Daiquan S. Price et al
as 2:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
4th and Main, LLC
Defendant:
Daiquan S. Price and Denice Smith
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Pamela Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
