Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Randle v. Nicholson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07890
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Inc., Gomez, Walter Nicholson and others
Plaintiff: Charles Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quickle v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv06250
Defendant: Laskey, John Doe #1, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff: Donald D Quickle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Denton v. Rabideau et al
as 1:2018cv03583
Plaintiff: Joseph Denton
Defendant: Karen Rabideau, Lt. Bishop, R. Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Zirko v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 18-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN ZIRKO
Defendant - Appellee: PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CATALINO BAUTISTA, M.D., MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Adams v. Egbe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv50141
Plaintiff: Byron E. Adams
Defendant: Egbe and Rabideau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rabideau v. Knight Adjustment Bureau et al
as 2:2018cv00248
Plaintiff: David Rabideau
Defendant: Knight Adjustment Bureau and Jay V Barney PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bobbit v. Rabideau et al
as 1:2018cv02465
Plaintiff: Lisa Bobbit
Defendant: Dean Rabideau, "FNU" [First Name Unknown] Wong, "FNU" [First Name Unknown Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Rabideau et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff: Robert Morris
Defendant: Karen Rabideau, Terri Anderson, John R Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pfister et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08789
Plaintiff: Andre Jones
Defendant: Randy Pfister, Tarry Williams, Karen M. Rabideau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Schott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01355
Plaintiff: Ontario Davis
Defendant: John Schott, Andrew Molina, Joseph Esqueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?