Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Nvidia Corporation v. Rambus Inc.
as 3:2008cv05500
Plaintiff:
Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia Corporation, Nvidia Corporation and others
Defendant:
Rambus Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NVIDIA CORPORATION v. RAMBUS, INC.
as 1:2008cv00473
Plaintiff:
NVIDIA CORPORATION
Defendant:
RAMBUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rambus Inc. v. Nvidia Corporation
as 3:2008cv03343
Plaintiff:
Rambus Inc., Rambus Inc., Rambus Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nvidia Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Francl v. PricewaterhouseCoopers et al
as 5:2008cv01315
Plaintiff:
Herbert Francl, Herbert Francl, Herbert Francl and others
Defendant:
PricewaterhouseCoopers, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Rambus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kelley v. Rambus, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02455
Plaintiff:
Douglas B. Kelley
Defendant:
Rambus, Inc., Pricewaterhouse Coopers, LLP, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich Rosati, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Rovere v. Rambus, Inc.
as 3:2007cv01832
Plaintiff:
Arleen Rovere, Arleen Rovere, Arleen Rovere and others
Defendant:
Rambus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Kelley et al v. Rambus, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv01238
Plaintiff:
James M Kelley, Miki W. Larsson and Douglas B. Kelley
Defendant:
Rambus, Inc., Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS V RAMBUS
as 06-1579
Defendant-Appellant:
Rambus, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
IN RE RAMBUS INC
as 04-M773
Respondent:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA INC. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Petitioner:
RAMBUS INC.
IN RE RAMBUS INC
as 04-M772
Respondent:
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING NORTH AMERICA INC. and INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Petitioner:
RAMBUS INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
