Cases 31 - 40 of 256
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEB GROCERY CO. LP, RITE AID HEADQUARTERS CORPORATION, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 345 HEALTH CARE FUND, WALGREEN CO., KROGER COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ASTRAZENECA AB, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party:
CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Intervenor:
EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and others
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Vista Healthplan Inc, et al v. Cephalon Inc, et al
as 15-8085
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
VISTA HEALTHPLAN INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent:
CEPHALON INC, BARR LABORATORIES INC, MYLAN LABORATORIES INC and others
Ranbaxy Laboratories Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.
as 15-12996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANBAXY LABORATORIES INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST DATABANK, INC.
City of Providence v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
City of Providence, Rhode Island
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2015cv03505
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff:
American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, et al v. Sylvia Burwell, et al
as 15-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited and Ranbaxy Inc
Defendant - Appellee:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, M.D. in her official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., IVAX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED et al
as 2:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED and RANBAXY INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
