Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Lisa Bernal v. Providence Health, et al
as 21-55661
Defendant / Appellee:
JESSICA BENTLEY, BRIAN J. MCNAMARA, KATELYN MICHEL HICKS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LISA M. BERNAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLABAUGH v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv01652
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. SLABAUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARICO v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 1:2021cv12355
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. d/b/a LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ARICO
ARICO v. CHURCHILL CAPITAL CORPORATION IV et al
as 3:2021cv12355
Defendant:
MICHAEL KLEIN, ATIEVA, INC. doing business as LUCID MOTORS, PETER RAWLINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS ARICO
Petitioner:
Max Royal LLC, Seung R. Lee, Hee K. Lee and others
Arec D Simeri v. Churchill Capital Corporation IV et al
as 2:2021cv04295
Defendant:
Michael Klein, Jay Faragin, Peter Rawlinson and others
Plaintiff:
Arec D Simeri
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
