Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Mitchell v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 2:2012cv00383
Plaintiff:
Linda Rena Mitchell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murphy v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Harden Murphy
Defendant:
Sandra Giles , Renae Mason , Jessie Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Lawrence County Department of Human Resources et al
as 5:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Latasha Parker
Defendant:
Lawrence County Department of Human Resources , Jerry Groce , Morgan County Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manson v. Sexton et al
as 7:2012cv00241
Plaintiff:
Marlon A Manson
Defendant:
Ted Sexton, Eric Bailey, Rena Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Watson et al
as 2:2011cv01220
Defendant:
Rena B McCormick
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Watson
Counter_claimant:
Rena B McCormick
Counter_defendant:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02465
Plaintiff:
Tonia Georgina Rena Roberts
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vanslyke v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02008
Plaintiff:
Renae Vanslyke
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Eunice Renae Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stinson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Rena D. Stinson
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley et al v. International Paper Company
as 2:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, Thomas L. Brantley, Thomas L. Brantley and others
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
