Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Berry v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00056
Petitioner:
Robert Sherman Berry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robert Berry v. USA
as 12-73818
Petitioner:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY, AKA Jim Preston
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Robert Berry
as 12-35796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY, AKA Jim Preston
Local Government Center, Inc., et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Paula Adriance, John Andrews, Paul G. Beecher and others
Defendant:
Employers' First Insurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Covington v. Intermountain Spine Institute et al
as 2:2011cv01070
Plaintiff:
Josh Covington
Defendant:
Intermountain Spine Institute, Reed Fogg, Robert M. Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00429
Petitioner:
Robert Sherman Berry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Berry et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00618
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Berry and Beverly Berry
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robert Berry v. USA
as 11-72713
Petitioner:
ROBERT SHERMAN BERRY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BERRY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65716
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BERRY and DOROTHY BERRY
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BERRY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06221
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BERRY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
