Cases 31 - 40 of 233
Mansaray v. Dean et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Petitioner:
Mohamed Mansaray
Respondent:
Robert Dean and The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ECKMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEAN ECKMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santos Bey v. Frosh et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Warden Robert Dean and The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bryant E. Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Darius Horton, Express Funeral Funding, Hartford, The Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAN v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES
as 2:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEAN
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES doing business as STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Davis v. Dean
as 1:2022cv03343
Petitioner:
Antoine Sheldon Davis
Respondent:
Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Day
as 5:2022cv04736
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Robert Dean Day
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Whitehead v. Dean et al
as 1:2022cv02643
Petitioner:
Renardo Whitehead
Respondent:
Robert Dean and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TICKLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20223
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEAN TICKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shabazz v. Dean
as 1:2022cv02570
Plaintiff:
Shakim Shabazz
Defendant:
Warden Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
